"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder", Voltaire is quoted as saying. A fine phrase to say that everyone will find different physical aspects attractive. Nevertheless, many are trying to find out if the value of charm is universal, if there are criteria that, from ancient times to the present day, have endured. YouTube artist Charlie Danger has produced a video on the subject, with a partnership from an exhibition at the Louvre based on the notion of beauty.
Evolutionary theorists claim that men have always preferred young women with a slim waist-to-hip ratio because they would be a demonstration of their fertility and therefore the preservation of the species. Except that this theory doesn't hold water when we compare women's vision of beauty with men's. After all, they too should be looking for the best. After all, they too should seek out the males who represent fertility. Yet this is not really the case. Especially since studies show that women's fertility is highest after the age of twenty, up to around the age of 30.
In fact, culture is central to our vision of what is and isn't beautiful. Among the Greeks, women's finery was more important than their bodies, and the Romans adored thick eyebrows. Thin, pale-skinned women were attractive in the Middle Ages, while voluptuousness was the order of the day during the Renaissance.
Athletic men were of the highest standard during Antiquity, but the late Renaissance saw monarchs launch fashions for wigs and high heels among the bourgeoisie (when these artifices served to hide flaws). While certain Western traits seem to recur in the various periods, this remains tenuous and each will embrace different approaches. The Middle Ages outlawed cosmetics as abject manipulation, while the modern era demanded many aesthetic changes from women.
If we compare it to the automobile industry, education has almost become its opposite... And yet, the purpose of both is to transport or teach, in order to help society AND its citizens achieve their goals.
It's sometimes difficult to understand children who don't dare to do very much. However, it's not usually their fault: they're victims of overprotection by adults, who don't give them the keys they need to analyze their environment or adopt appropriate strategies. Shouldn't we let them grow up and experiment on their own? When societal overprotection undermines the ability to adapt.
The Pygmalion effect is not just a psychological curiosity, but a relational dynamic that cuts across all fields of learning. A look back at scientific studies on the Pygmalion effect, named after the sculptor who fell in love with his sculpture.