Publish at September 09 2025 Updated September 10 2025
Beyond the fantasy of the "replaced teacher", generative AI is silently transforming students' postures, learning strategies and relationships to knowledge. The mutations are numerous: cognitive delegation, temporal contraction, new prompt engineering, crisis of epistemic authority.
This article is reserved for subscribers to the full edition. You can subscribe Here.
You might also like:
Review evaluation grids with learners
The evaluation grid, often perceived as a simple table, nevertheless concentrates technical, symbolic and political stakes. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu, Foucault, Vygotski, Honneth and Sen, this article shows how the co-construction of criteria with learners redefines the pedagogical contract: it exposes power relationships, nurtures intrinsic motivation and paves the way for evaluative justice based on capabilities.
The desire to learn tested by science
Fluctuations in the desire and motivation to learn show how the learner's agentivity emerges from isolation to integrate interaction with the environment.
Doing a new pedagogy in your own way. Pedagogical radicality is characterized in its practices by its intensity, singularity and agility.
Pedagogical scenario controller: a new role for the teacher
Harnessing the available communication tools, abilities, and multiple interests of students is seemingly difficult to reconcile with linear or tightly scripted instruction. And it is precisely these roles of "lesson planner, researcher, and communicator" that many teachers define themselves by...
Inquiry, dialogue and confrontation: the new levers of critical thinking in training
Adults are confronted with unprecedented information inflation, competing expert discourses and digital devices whose logic remains opaque. Critical thinking is essential if they are to cope with the errors of algorithms. What teaching methods are the most appropriate?
