Publish at September 24 2025 Updated September 24 2025
The arrival of a new technology always raises legitimate questions: how can we ensure that everyone uses it properly? All the more so as AI appears in a burning, raw social, political and environmental context. Everyone wants AI literacy, but is it really possible?
This article is reserved for subscribers to the full edition. You can subscribe Here.
You might also like:
Puzzle classes to integrate minorities in schools
When the laws of racial segregation disappeared in the United States, social homogenization did not take place as easily as hoped, especially in schools. An American pedagogue then imagined a new way of organizing learning, breaking radically with the competitive practices in force at the time. His method is still relevant in increasingly heterogeneous school environments.
Pedagogical scenario controller: a new role for the teacher
Harnessing the available communication tools, abilities, and multiple interests of students is seemingly difficult to reconcile with linear or tightly scripted instruction. And it is precisely these roles of "lesson planner, researcher, and communicator" that many teachers define themselves by...
Faced with the unexpected, think unconventionally
Beyond the search for single causality and the hegemony of rationality, individual or collective decision-making rigidity can be an obstacle to managing the unexpected. Methods for overcoming them.
From paper portfolio to e-portfolio: reinterpreting learning over time
The transition from paper to e-portfolio is transforming the way we learn, assess and recognize ourselves as learners. Far from being a simple administrative tool, it becomes a space for interpretation, a place where memory, projects and identity are woven together. In the age of AI and lifelong learning, the e-portfolio opens the way to a pedagogy of rereading: rereading to understand, recounting to project.
Competences versus theoretical knowledge in our society today
A skill is an ability applied to knowledge. Distinguish between constructivist, constructionist, connectivist and cognitivist knowledge.
