Publish at January 21 2026 Updated January 21 2026
The everyday experience of digital technologies is accompanied by a range of micro- and macro-excitations that reshape our relationship to the world, to others and to ourselves. These multiple and heterogeneous excitations are not simply a matter of preferences of use: they are the product of a technical environment that stimulates, captures, amplifies or diverts certain dimensions of our experience.
Understanding these excitations sheds light on contemporary transformations in attention, cognition and learning, in a context where digital technology now constitutes a total social environment.
Entering through excitation reveals that digital mediations act not just as tools, but as environments that condition ways of perceiving, acting and feeling. Augustin Berque, speaking of mediance, reminds us that every milieu is the result of a co-constitution between humans and environments: our digital gestures, rhythms and emotions are shaped as much as they shape the devices. Excitement is thus a sensitive indicator of this trajective encounter between human and technology.
Platforms rely on micro-stimuli such as alerts, vibrations or bright colors to activate vigilance circuits. These devices are part of what Yves Citton calls the "attention economy", where technologies aim less to inform than to maintain engagement in a continuous flow.
The result is a feeling of permanent urgency and difficulty sustaining long-term attention. Here, excitement functions as a brief jolt that revives the gesture, at the risk of altering the attentional depth required for reasoning or creation. The cumulative effect of these solicitations produces what Hartmut Rosa describes as a regime of acceleration: digital temporality reduces downtime, densifies action and accelerates relationships. This sustained rhythm increases subjective intensity, the impression of being alive, connected and integrated, while at the same time diminishing the ability to withdraw, distance oneself and contemplate.
Digital technology simultaneously generates cognitive pleasure: browsing hypertext, solving a problem using AI, discovering precise information in a matter of seconds. The almost infinite availability of resources stimulates exploration, improvisation and intuition.
This cognitive excitement feeds intellectual autonomy and gives the feeling of increased power to act. The downside is cognitive rush: the more resources are accessible, the more the mind rushes from one idea to another, sometimes without having time to integrate knowledge.
The risk is not error, but dispersion. Excitement accelerates discovery, but can hinder knowledge from taking root. This is a central paradox of digital learning: unlimited access can reduce consolidation.
Digital mediations produce a profoundly social excitement. The thumbs-up, the comment, the notification of presence create an environment where recognition becomes a permanent flux.
Louise Merzeau speaks of "digital identities" shaped by a logic of visibility and reciprocal capture. This relational excitement generates an amplified, sometimes euphoric sense of social existence. However, this continuous exposure also encourages comparison, the expectation of validation and affective polarization.
Platforms value emotionally intense content such as indignation, admiration or anger, as they stimulate engagement. Excitement is then a vector for the collective amplification of emotions. Individuals oscillate between gratification and vulnerability, between a sense of belonging and a fragile identity. The digital world thus becomes a space for high-frequency emotional socialization, where emotion flows faster than reflection.
Our relationship with technology is also based on technical excitement. Infinite scrolling, sliding and tactile fluidity create the pleasure of manipulation, the pleasure of acting on a reactive object.
Ilbert Simondon already described this dynamic: technical objects arouse fascination when they resonate with our gestures. Contemporary interfaces take this resonance to a whole new level, where every movement seems to prolong the body and extend its capabilities.
This excitement feeds an almost libidinal relationship with devices. It motivates use, reinforces attachment to interfaces, but can also sustain a dependency linked to the immediate satisfaction of the gesture.
Digital content such as images, videos and music trigger rapid emotional arousal. The succession of emotions in a matter of seconds generates a regime of continuous intensity. Platforms favor short, punchy narratives, capable of provoking an immediate impact.
This intensity is conducive to empathy, social engagement and emotional learning. The opposite effect can emerge when excitement becomes too strong or too frequent: saturation, diffuse anxiety, difficulty in regulating emotions. Digital learning then requires an affective ecology that helps restore rhythms compatible with reflection.
Digital mediations reorganize the rhythm of life. Permanent access to others and to information produces a sensation of urgency and simultaneity. Digital time is "tense", almost frictionless. The expected response, the possible action, the available information: everything seems capable of being realized on the spot.
Rhythmic excitement reinforces the feeling of being in touch with the world, but imposes a cost: the loss of the slow temporalities needed to integrate, deepen and mature ideas.
Many digital devices mobilize ludic mechanisms: badges, levels, points, series, challenges. These elements stimulate the reward system and support motivation. They promote engagement in certain learning activities, encouraging progress in small steps.
This playful excitement can become problematic if it replaces intrinsic motivation. When the main challenge becomes winning points, the activity loses its meaning, reduced to a mechanical sequence of rewards.
Each user constructs a digital presence in which they adjust, refine and stage a version of themselves. This personal storytelling generates an excitement of identity, made up of both freedom (choosing one's image) and constraint (meeting the implicit standards of the platforms).
This tension creates a space for creative experimentation, but also exposes the fragility of one's relationship to oneself when the projected identity diverges from one's lived identity.
Immersive technologies - virtual reality, augmented reality, 3D environments - produce powerful imaginative excitement. They expand the body's possibilities, alter perceptual framing and invite us to explore new worlds. This excitement opens up promising pedagogical horizons: simulation, experimentation, situated empathy.
The mirror effect is the possible disconnection from concrete bodily experience when immersion becomes too dominant. The educational challenge is to articulate immersion and anchoring, imagination and sensitivity.
All these excitements form an ecology. They are neither good nor bad in themselves: everything depends on their intensity, their frequency, and their place in our learning environments. Digital mediations reorganize the sensitive, practical and symbolic mediations of existence. They amplify our capacities, but can also erode our attentional, affective and relational resources.
Learning to recognize the excitements we experience is a major educational challenge. It's less a question of resisting than of discerning: spotting what sets us in motion, what disperses us, what affects us, what uplifts us.
Digital education thus becomes an education in the environments in which our gestures, thoughts and relationships are woven. Digital learning implies an expanded awareness of the forces that modulate our presence in the world.
References
Berque, A. (2010). Médiance. De milieux en paysages. Belin.
Citton, Y. (2014). Pour une écologie de l'attention. Seuil.
Merzeau, L. (2013). Présence numérique. Hermès, 65, 21-30.
Rosa, H. (2010). Acceleration. A social critique of time. La Découverte.
Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. Aubier.
You might also like:
Presence: welcoming the emerging future
An exploration of Otto Scharmer's thinking on the concept of presence, which he extends from the individual to groups and the planet as a whole.
Thinking together is not about collecting ideas or extracting the best one. Thinking together is the fruit of a confrontation, a spark that springs up like that of flints being rubbed together. To want to avoid confrontation is to deprive oneself of the fruits of cross-fertilization.
Mass tourism, immersion, digital nomadism: 3 ways of travelling, 3 different stories
Before booking a trip, we rarely ask ourselves what we really want from it. This article looks at three ways of traveling - mass tourism, immersion and digital nomadism - not to rank them in order of importance, but to point out what distinguishes them in depth.
Fear of success as a barrier to achieving goals
Fear of success is a duel between our aspirations and our apprehensions. Is it a goal I've set for myself, or the one I've been encouraged to adopt?
From "buyer personas" to "student personas", defining them for educational activities
It's sometimes tricky to take up marketing concepts given that the teaching objective is fundamentally different. However, when marketing is customer-centric like our teaching is student-centric, it can make perfect sense.
