A cell does not have a brain, yet the brain is composed of cells. Is the organization of cells the underlying principle of brain function? Scientists are trying to find explanations for knowledge. This has resulted in artificial neural networks that are based on probabilistic learning methods and are modulated by various thresholds that satisfy or do not satisfy predetermined criteria. The level of the "thresholds" is most often established by the activity in the possibility field; over time the most efficient possibility logically becomes the most used.
This is for an artificial neural network, equipped with electronic memory and a database. In the case of a cell, the question was what could it possibly remember and more importantly how?
The Blob to the Rescue
The blob is a single-celled being that neither fits the definition of a plant, animal, or fungus. It moves, it can photosynthesize, and it can spread by spores. It can also reach a large size, we are talking about several square meters. It's just a huge protoplasm that can separate and merge again. It has also been found that it learns, can communicate its knowledge, and remember.
For some of its memory, it is not clear how it accumulates its preferences, but as for its computational abilities, it is known to use its tracks: if they are dry, it is no; it has been there before and it is worthless. Otherwise, if there are no tracks, it's "maybe", we can try. If it's good, we go that way. The simplicity of the system allows it to quickly find the best route, the best solution. Its memory and database are external, deposited on the territory. The principle of the memory palace finds a concrete illustration here.
Where it becomes fascinating is that the blob can communicate the preference, the result to be sought, the principle, to another blob, without the latter having experienced it. A form of coding of a principle is realized and can be shared. What works is valued. In three hours, the transferred information is encoded into the cores of the blob.
Networked Learning
Once a value can be communicated to a process, it becomes relevant to teach and learn. It is assumed that the entire educational corpus is composed of principles that are potentially useful to those who learn them.
A blob probably assigns value to everything it can eat and the ways it can get it. We also assign value to what we can eat and the ways we get it, whether by hunting, herding, gathering, or farming. More generally, we value anything that enhances our ability to have, do and be. Sometimes we also go astray by developing short-sighted solutions. But by communicating, we will eventually find the optimal solution, based on our results.
So, if theoretical learning can be passed on, in practice it will be validated. The feedback obtained seems essential to the adaptation and maintenance of any process. For example, the analysis of data and the circumstances of any anomaly, whether it is an unexpected result or an accident, is important. Teaching in the absence of application or feedback will never be as effective as participatory teaching, with application and shared feedback.
If a cell learns, there is a good chance that its learning principles will remain valid for us too.
Many think tanks call on university researchers to study and put forward ideas. These may even influence politicians' decisions. However, while some laboratories are objective, many are partisan and act more or less ethically depending on the case. A situation that raises many questions.
The issue of discipline in education has never ceased to obsess teachers. Some argue for a return to more sanctions and strict rules. Others, on the other hand, advocate a more sensitive approach to the student, asking for an understanding of what causes bad behaviour. Some schools even go so far as to have no rules at all...
Studies suggest that video games can improve certain cognitive skills, but keeping a balance is essential, with parents and educators playing a key role in managing playtime and selecting appropriate content.
Which organization, which key competencies and which management to rebuild after the crisis? The organizations that were presented as examples of success a few months ago are no longer so, employees' aspirations are different and teams are dispersed when it is necessary to work as a group... Many employees have made a thirty-year technological leap in two months!
When we reread the documented experience of a Cree/Eeyou tracker, a native of North America, we understand that interpreting also involves the body and symbiosis with the environment.