Publish at March 19 2025 Updated March 19 2025
In the age of the digital revolution, the world of education is undergoing profound changes. The rise of educational technologies such as e-learning platforms, MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) and task automation tools raises fundamental questions about the place and role of the teacher in the 21st century. Some EdTech prophets go so far as to predict the end of teachers, who will be replaced by more powerful, interactive and adaptable tools. Faced with this reality, it's worth asking: to what extent is the teacher still essential in an increasingly digital educational environment?
Despite the undeniable benefits of digital technology in terms of accessibility, personalization and learner engagement, the teacher retains a unique and irreplaceable value thanks to his or her human and pedagogical skills. More than just a transmitter of knowledge, the teacher is a mediator, a companion, a coach who plays a key role in the cognitive, metacognitive and socio-affective development of learners.
To support this thesis, we will draw on multidisciplinary contributions from the educational sciences, information and communication sciences, the psychology of learning and the philosophy of education. We will show that the teacher's added value in relation to educational technologies is expressed at several complementary levels:
Using this analytical grid, we aim to characterize the human, almost "artisanal" added value of the teaching profession in the face of the industrialization of training. This will lead us to question the real "value" of techno-educational innovations, while avoiding any overly optimistic or technophobic discourse. Instead, my aim is to show how digital and human resources can complement each other to enhance the quality of learning.
Ultimately, the aim of this article is to help raise the profile of the fine profession of teaching, by showing that its social utility and expertise remain essential in the digital knowledge society. At a time when drop-out rates and tensions are on the rise in the teaching profession, it is urgent to reaffirm loud and clear that teachers are not "little hands" destined to be Uberized, but key players in building the school and society of the 21st century.
Digital technologies offer tremendous opportunities for rethinking teaching practices.(1) In particular, they enable us to diversify learning media and methods (text, image, sound, video, virtual reality, etc.), offer more personalized learning paths, automate certain exercises and feedback, and promote collaboration between peers.
However, teaching methods do not have to be adapted to the new technologies; it is up to the new technologies to serve a coherent teaching project. In other words, digital technology is not an end in itself, but a tool that teachers must make their own in the service of carefully considered pedagogical choices(2).
While digital technology facilitates access to a multitude of educational resources, it is not enough to guarantee learning. Learning is an active process that requires human "mediation".(3) The teacher plays an essential role in guiding learners, structuring their thinking, supporting their reasoning and helping them to make connections between notions.
Work on self-regulated learning(4) also shows that the skills of planning, monitoring and self-assessment are not innate, but need to be explicitly taught. In an age of infobesity and fake news, the teacher is more than ever a "ferryman", helping learners to make their way critically and rationally through the labyrinth of knowledge.
Teaching is not just a matter of techniques or technologies. It's a veritable "art" that mobilizes a set of complex professional gestures, in particular to arouse the interest and commitment of students, to adapt in real time to their reactions, to improvise in the face of the unexpected...(5) It requires experience, pedagogical "tact", a form of creative "bricolage" that the Anglo-Saxons call "craft knowledge".
This art of teaching relies on situational intelligence, an ability to "feel" the group and its dynamics, which algorithms and artificial intelligence struggle to model. A chatbot may be able to animate a question-and-answer game, or even provide "individualized" feedback, but it will have difficulty managing the socio-cognitive interactions that make a teaching-learning situation so rich.
Teaching is first and foremost an act of communication and human interaction.(6) But educational communication has specific features that distinguish it from other forms of interaction (friendly, hierarchical, commercial...).(7) It aims to bring about cognitive change in the learner, in a relationship that is both asymmetrical (the teacher has the expertise) and cooperative (the student is the actor in his or her own learning).
According to the orchestral communication model, communication in the classroom is not simply a process of transmitting information, but consists of creating an "invisible score" in which everyone has a role to play.(8) The teacher is the conductor who sets the tempo, harmonizes interactions and ensures that everyone participates. Far from being a mere transmitter, he or she establishes a relational dynamic conducive to learning, based on listening, benevolence and high standards.
Socio-constructivist theories have highlighted the fundamentally social and interactive dimension of learning. For Vygotski, thought first develops through interaction with others, before being internalized. The teacher plays the role of mediator, enabling students to move from what they can do with help (their "zone of proximal development") to what they can do on their own.
Classroom interaction is therefore a powerful driver of learning, through socio-cognitive conflict, the co-elaboration of knowledge, peer tutoring, etc. Collaborative digital tools (wikis, forums, social networks, etc.) can foster these interactions, provided they are integrated into a relevant pedagogical scenario and "orchestrated" by a teacher attentive to the socio-relational climate.
Beyond the simple transmission of knowledge, the teacher plays a major role in giving meaning to knowledge and linking it to the learners' experience. According to Ausubel's theory of meaningful learning, learning is only truly integrated if it makes sense to the individual and is anchored in his or her prior cognitive structures(9).
The teacher helps to build these conceptual bridges, by explaining the relevance of the concepts covered, by relating them to the students' experiences and questions, and by proposing concrete situations for application. In this way, they help to motivate learners by meeting their needs for competence, autonomy and relationships with others. This requires qualities of empathetic communication, explicitness and argumentation that are not given to everyone, and that a machine will have difficulty reproducing.
Cognitive science has amply demonstrated the crucial role played by emotions in the learning process.(10)(11) Emotions can have a facilitating effect (motivation, pleasure, feelings of competence, etc.) or an inhibiting effect (anxiety, boredom, feelings of failure, etc.) on memory, attention and reasoning.
Teachers play a key role in emotional regulation, through their ability to establish a calm classroom climate, defuse tension and encourage effort. He or she listens to students' emotional experiences, takes on board their fears in the face of difficulties, and values their progress. This quality of presence, empathy and psychological support is essential for learners, especially the most fragile. A machine will be able to detect facial or verbal emotions, but it will be more difficult to provide this existential comfort.
Beyond the emotional domain, teachers also support their students' socio-cognitive development. They help them structure their thinking, and develop cross-disciplinary skills such as abstraction, critical thinking, problem-solving and argumentation. It does this by confronting them with complex tasks, guiding them in their strategies, and teaching them to cooperate and debate constructively. It also contributes to their socialization, by teaching them the rules of collective life, citizenship education, cultural openness...
In short, it helps to create well-rounded, responsible individuals who are not reducible to AI-powered computer brains. Above all, school is a micro-society where we learn to live together, under the benevolent gaze of an adult mentor.
With the spectacular progress of AI, we are seeing the emergence of increasingly "intelligent" educational applications. Chatbots are capable of engaging in natural language dialogue, providing explanations, guiding users through exercises... However, these tools remain limited in terms of emotional and social intelligence. A robot can only "simulate" empathy using statistical and behavioral techniques, but it has no access to the intimate experiences of others. Similarly, it can optimize a customized learning path, but without perceiving the identity and social issues at stake for the learner. The risk is to develop a "computational" vision of learning, reduced to a mechanical process of accumulating and retaining information. The teacher reminds us that all knowledge is embodied, situated and embedded in history and culture.
Teaching is not about applying standardized pedagogical techniques. It's a reflective practice that requires constant questioning of one's choices, analysis of their effects, and adaptation to unforeseen circumstances. The teacher is a "reflective practitioner" who mobilizes action-based knowledge, forged through experience and constantly reworked. He or she develops a fine-tuned understanding of situations, an ability to improvise and cobble together solutions, which has nothing to do with an algorithmic process.
This "ecological" expertise can only be acquired through hands-on practice and reflection in action. It resists formalization and automation, even if reflective tools such as portfolios and video training can enrich it. The expert teacher is not an "executor" of best practices, but a creator of blended pedagogical solutions(12).
In a world of perpetual change, creativity is becoming a key 21st century skill.(13) It lies at the heart of the teaching profession, which is constantly called upon to innovate in order to adapt to changes in knowledge, technologies and audiences. Being creative means imagining new learning situations, diverting tools and media from their usual use, crossing disciplinary approaches...
This pedagogical inventiveness cannot be reduced to the application of "creativity techniques" or "innovative" technologies. It requires an educational vision and values, the audacity to think outside the box, and the pedagogical freedom to test original approaches. It is nourished by the unique personality of each teacher, his or her sensitivity, culture and commitment to projects that make sense to him or her. In short, it resists industrialization and the homogenization of practices.
Digital technologies abound with tools designed for teaching, such as digital whiteboards, augmented textbooks, exercise platforms, serious games, turnkey applications... But the most innovative teachers are often those who divert mainstream tools from their intended uses, to better serve their pedagogical objectives. They'll use social networks to get their students to collaborate, run a blog to publish their writings, create a webdoc to tell the story of a field investigation, program a mini-game video for a math lesson...
In a "bottom-up innovation" approach, they use their imagination to exploit the educational potential of constantly reinvented everyday artifacts. They experiment, observe and adjust, in an iterative, agile logic that contrasts with the fixed nature of many "off-the-shelf" educational tools. In so doing, they show the way to a creative, modular, appropriable digital education.
At the end of this analysis, it appears that the unique value of the teacher in the digital age lies in a combination of pedagogical, relational and reflective skills. Far from becoming obsolete, teaching expertise is being questioned and reaffirmed in the face of the growing power of educational technologies. Because what "makes" a good teacher is not just knowledge and techniques, but a commitment to relationships with others, an intelligence of situations, and a constantly renewed educational inventiveness. It's an embodied, empathetic, benevolent presence that knows how to adapt continuously to the evolving needs of learners. Today, no chatbot can simulate this quality of presence.
However, it's not a question of rejecting digital contributions wholesale, in a Manichean vision pitting human against machine. The best teachers are often those who develop a relaxed relationship with technology, using it creatively in the service of their teaching projects. Similarly, the development of "explainable" and ethical AI, imbued with humanist values, could provide a useful complement to teaching action, provided it is co-constructed with practitioners. The challenge is to think of a human-machine complementarity that does not degrade the teaching profession, but on the contrary enriches it, in a logic of "augmented collaboration".
There is therefore an urgent need to enhance the status of the teaching profession, which has been damaged by years of managerial rationalization and is now being shaken up by the digital tsunami. It's time to remember that teaching is an art of relationship and a commitment to the community, part of a humanist vision of education. At a time when GAFAMs are investing massively in EdTech, when neuroscience promises to optimize learning, when health crises are accelerating the virtualization of exchanges, preserving the human dimension of teaching is a crucial democratic issue. It is this humanity, sensitivity and sharing that teachers can pass on to future generations, to help them become "augmented human beings" rather than high-performance robots.
Illustration: AI-generated - Flavien Albarras
References
1- MERRIAUX, Jean-Marc, 2021. Le numérique à l'école: la crise sanitaire, une opportunité pour développer une culture numérique. Annales des Mines - Enjeux numériques. 2021. Vol. 13, n° 1, pp. 27-31. DOI 10.3917/ennu.013.0027.
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-enjeux-numeriques-2021-1-page-27?lang=fr
2- Le numérique pour l'éducation : un moyen, pas une fin, 2016. Sophie Blitman [online]. Available at: https: //sophie-blitman.fr/le-numerique-pour-leducation-un-moyen-pas-une-fin/ [Accessed February 10, 2025].
3- WEIL-BARAIS, Annick and RESTA-SCHWEITZER, Marcela, 2008. A cognitive and developmental approach to mediation in a teaching-learning context. La nouvelle revue de l'adaptation et de la scolarisation. 2008. Vol. 42, n° 2, pp. 83-98. DOI 10.3917/nras.042.0083.
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-la-nouvelle-revue-de-l-adaptation-et-de-la-scolarisation-2008-2-page-83?lang=fr
4- COSNEFROY, Laurent, 2010. Self-regulated learning: perspectives in adult education. Savoirs. 2010. Vol. 23, n° 2, pp. 9-50. DOI 10.3917/savo.023.0009.
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-savoirs-2010-2-page-9?lang=fr
5- Enseigner, un art du geste - Parlons pratiques! #6, [no date]. Extra classe [online]. Available at: https: //extraclasse.reseau-canope.fr/parlons-pratiques-6-enseigner-un-art-du-geste [Accessed February 10, 2025].
6- ALAVA, Séraphin, 2007. CHAPTER 6. Les pratiques médiatiques de l'enseignant : quelle validité pour la recherche ? In: Transformation des regards sur la recherche en technologie de l'éducation [online]. De Boeck Supérieur. pp. 107-121 [Accessed February 10, 2025].
https://shs.cairn.info/transformation-des-regards-sur-la-recherche--9782804155216-page-107?lang=fr
7- GRANDATY, Michel, 2011. Interactions et apprentissages disciplinaires : la médiation de l'enseignant. Carrefours de l'éducation. August 1, 2011. Vol. 1, n° 3, pp. 121-135. DOI 10.3917/cdle.hs01.0121.
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-carrefours-de-l-education-2011-3-page-121?lang=fr
8- [Solved] le modle orchestral de la communication cest quoi - Introduction à la sociologie - Studocu, [no date]. [online]. Available at: https: //www.studocu.com/fr/messages/question/3816059/le-modele-orchestral-de-la-communication-cest-quoi [Accessed February 10, 2025].
9- Meaningful learning: definition and characteristics, 2018. Nos Pensées [online]. Available at: https: //nospensees.fr/apprentissage-significatif-definition-caracteristiques/ [Accessed February 10, 2025].
10- MAZARS, Mélanie and STEFANIAK, Nicolas, 2021. Chapitre 5. Emotions and the implicit/explicit learning process. In : Emotions et apprentissages [online]. Dunod. pp. 151-179. ISBN 978-2-10-081111-3. [Accessed February 10, 2025].
https:// shs.cairn.info/emotions-et-apprentissages--9782100811113-page-151?lang=fr
11- Chapter 2. Cognitive and social processes involved in learning | Cairn.info, [no date]. [online]. Available at: https: //shs.cairn.info/emotions-et-apprentissages--9782100811113-page-50?lang=fr [Accessed February 10, 2025].
12- GAGNÉ, Gilles, 2006. Qu'est-ce qu'enseigner?:Notes pour le congrès de l'Alliance des professeurs de Montréal. Revue du MAUSS. November 1, 2006. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 70-84. DOI 10.3917/rdm.028.0070.
https:// shs.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2006-2-page-70?lang=fr
13- (2) Creativity and the 21st century | LinkedIn, [no date]. [online]. Available at: https: //www.linkedin.com/pulse/la-cr%C3%A9ativit%C3%A9-et-le-21e-si%C3%A8cle-alain-castonguay/ [Accessed February 10, 2025]
You might also like:
The nervous limits of teachers
The search for efficiency, amplified by ever more efficient technological and administrative systems, is leading us to a reordering of relationships. Teachers can be the victims, but they can also benefit if they guide the changes...
The neutral mask, a tool for self-awareness and body appropriation
"Neutrality is not the absence of expression, emotion or feeling. It's a state of availability. Cathy Bouesse
Tomorrow, avatars of teachers and students?
The question of avatars may seem to be located only in the field of video games. As the dream of metavers continues, the subject of our digital twins emerges. What will they be used for? In education, what would be the benefits of an avatar classroom and teacher?
To make our lives a succession of intense moments, to live each day as the first... or the last, to go further, higher, stronger. We are regularly invited to seek intensity in order to add quality to our lives. Philosopher and writer Tristan Garcia has studied this concept and the origins of its success...
Deconstructing the historical myths of personal development
Relativize the beliefs and myths that make our lives more beautiful, but which are not necessarily right.
