The most common sharing errors (and how to avoid them)
Small reflexes to adopt when sharing
With cloud technology, it's never been easier to work remotely on projects. Programs like Google Disk make it easy to do so, without it being too complicated. It's easy to share work documents. However, this ease can come with security problems. All it takes is for a file to be shared publicly, when it was intended to be for the informed eye only, to create an information leak. It happens far more often than you might think.
This video is intended as a reminder of the mistakes you need to avoid with Google Disk (but this also applies to other software) to avoid disasters. When sharing, you need to think about the roles given to those with whom you're sharing the file. If a person only needs to look at the file, he or she is assigned the role of reader. If they need to provide hints or comments, they are assigned the role of commentator. The editor role should only be assigned to those who need to modify the file directly. This role can be changed at any time, and applies entirely to a shared folder.
Another common mistake is to leave the link sharing approach. Because all you need is the hyperlink to enter the folder or file, which can facilitate intrusions. It's better to opt for nominative sharing, preventing those who aren't linked from accessing the information. Disabling downloading and copying is an often-overlooked option, which nevertheless ensures file security.
The Brazilian Network for Creative Education (RBAC) is a movement of educators, students, parents, artists, researchers, businesses, and organizations that promote creative education.
Now that we all (or almost all) have small high-definition cameras with powerful microphones in our pockets, journalism is taking a new turn: mobile journalism. The English-speaking world calls it "MoJo" (Mobile Journalism), and more and more journalism schools are teaching it.
Competition doesn't mix well with pedagogy. They undermine the pleasure of learning, make participants forget their educational objectives and can damage their self-image. And yet, large-scale educational activities in the technical, automotive or robotics fields are based on competition between national and international teams. How can we explain the motivation and pedagogical interest generated by these tournaments?
An educational institution with the idea of integrating mobility into its offering will find here the foundations of a strategy that will have a chance of success as long as it focuses on uses. "Mobile Learning" seems like a utopia because it is not the use that is made of the devices because of the very context of their use: in action.
The pattern is everywhere. It is the model of the model, from our brain to our cells, from our youth to our old age, until our death. It is cellular, it is intellectual, it is physical, it is social. It is both normative and creative. Getting out of the models?