Publish at March 18 2026 Updated March 18 2026
Adaptive learning systems promise to adjust difficulty in real time using behavioral data. But can they really detect boredom or cognitive overload? This article shows that these deeply subjective and motivational states largely escape metrics. Adjustment "on its own" cannot be purely algorithmic: it presupposes a hybrid regulation combining data, pedagogical interpretation and learner metacognition.
This article is reserved for subscribers to the full edition. You can subscribe Here.
You might also like:
The importance of teacher recognition
Recognition drives motivation and boosts self-esteem. Teacher recognition is vital.
Commensality: the cause or consequence of collective intelligence
Eating together is the first step towards teamwork and building better projects.
We don't learn the same things in the city as we do in the country. The city shapes our inner landscapes and our ways of relating in many ways.
Generative AI: new cognitive weapon, new alphabet or new common?
Generative AI redistributes intellectual production and analysis capacities. It is a technology of cognitive power likely to amplify the inequalities between those who master it and those who are subjected to it. Its emancipatory potential depends on the pedagogical, cultural and institutional conditions of its appropriation. Are we ready to consider the mastery of cognitive technologies as an essential component of the educational common good?
What if the self-proclaimed experts were just beginners?
If you want to become an expert, pay attention to the stage you are in according to the Dreyfus model, it is a good way to assess yourself. If you are around someone you think is an expert in a field, also think about the different stages of the model and the ways to recognize an expert person described above. As for the title question, the answer is in the article.
