Publish at October 24 2017 Updated June 28 2023
When they leave their labs, scientists meet people for whom the universe is not made up of equations. Paranormal enthusiasts conjure up obscure forces and chains of causality riddled with contradictions. Others, on the contrary, use the results of their research to demonstrate anything and everything...
Some can't stand it, and jump into the fray, abandoning their research for a while in favor of polemics, in an attempt to explain what science is all about.
Georges Charpak is a chemist. But not just any chemist, since he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1992. Together with Henri Broch, he wrote a book with the attractive title "Devenez savant, devenez sorcier" (Become a scientist, become a sorcerer) in 2002.
More precisely, the book sets out to make us more knowledgeable and demystify "sorcerers". Charpak and Broch denounce the rhetoric of astrologers, graphologists and dream analysts.
They explain that astrologers use a frame of reference linked to the sun and not to the sidereal stars to study the movement of the stars, and are therefore mistaken by more than a million kilometers about the position of the earth.
But many will reply: "And yet what this or that astrologer says is true... I recognize myself in it". In response, Charpak and Broch cite an experiment in which students gave some information about their star signs and dreams. Some time later, the researcher brought them a document showing their profile, and most of them recognized themselves in it. But what they didn't know was that they'd all been given the same sheet, with the same profile... Charpak and Broch see this as an illustration of the "well effect", which means that the more vague and hollow something is, the more you recognize yourself in it.
The book goes on to explain the magicians' tricks. One might have wondered about the relevance of a Nobel Prize-winning scientist fighting against astrology, but wanting to demystify magic is an even more surprising undertaking. Who still believes that magic tricks are magic? They make us dream, they amaze us, they reveal that our attention and perception play tricks on us, but everyone knows there's a trick. And it's quite likely that most of us don't want it explained to us, just as we don't want details of special effects when we watch a film.
Since 2002, scientists have taken up the fight to debunk rumors. The website of theAssociation Française pour l'Information Scientifique (AFIS) (French Association for Scientific Information ) offers a wealth of well-documented, easy-to-understand contributions.
In 1996, Alan Sokal wrote an article for a scientific journal. He slipped in a number of scientific errors, but above all, he multiplied references to quantum mechanics, mathematics and post-modernism in sentences that made little sense. As soon as it was published, he denounced the deception and wrote a book with J. Bricmont on scientific impostures.
Twenty years on, it's hard to imagine the impact of the affair in the mainstream press, and the violence of the exchanges between the book's supporters and its critics.
The authors denounce the extrapolation of results from physics or mathematics into other sciences, by people with little knowledge of them. For example, Gödel's theorem on formal systems in mathematics has been used to explain the workings of human societies, or to justify religions... Philosopher Jacques Bouveresse has in turn denounced the abusive use of metaphors in the human sciences and philosophy.
Étienne Klein's book Galileo and the Indians takes a rather different view. It's no longer a question of opposing two ways of thinking, or determining who's right. The beginning of the book sets out two fundamentally different representations of the world, which can nevertheless be respected.
The physicist sees the world through equations, figures and concepts. The Kayapo Indians, on the other hand, live in a world where perceptions and sensations are essential. This encounter raises questions for the physicist: "Does science as taught by Galileo distance us from nature?"
The world of science is far from watertight. Because they fascinate, we're tempted to use them as a grid for analyzing our daily lives or more existential questions. Because they lend aura to a discourse, we sometimes use them as a metaphor...
In the 17th century, Pascal was already denouncing half-wits, who he considered far worse than those who didn't dabble in science.
With the Internet, these polemics have taken on added force. They add sarcasm and invective to the rectification or correction of errors.
Illustrations: Frédéric Duriez
Resources :
French Association for Scientific Information: consulted on October 21, 2017
https://www.afis.org/
Le scepticisme scientifique - balado-diffusion - consulted on October 21, 2017
https://www.scepticisme-scientifique.com/
we only regret the lack of detail on the objectives of the site, the definition of "scientific skepticism" and a presentation of the speakers.
Vincent Fleury and Yun Sun Limet: "L'escroquerie Sokal et Bricmont", article published in Libération on October 6, 1997, accessed October 21, 2017
http://next.liberation.fr/livres/1997/10/06/l-escroquerie-sokal-bricmont_218686
France Culture "La science nous éloigne-t-elle de la nature?" December 19, 2008 - accessed October 21, 2017
https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/science-publique/la-science-nous-eloigne-t-elle-de-la-nature
Université de Clermont "Les demi-habiles" consulted on the website "les Pensées de Blaise Pascal" October 21, 2017
http://www.penseesdepascal.fr/General/Lesdemi-habiles.php
Jacques Bouveresse "intellectuals and the media", interview recorded in 2007, accessed on October 21, 2017
https://youtu.be/oMbTChiAh5E
You might also like:
Where does the long road to success begin?
The road to success may be long, but the satisfaction of making progress is well worth the effort.
The nature class: a positive response to the current sedentary lifestyle
A large part of children's time is spent using screens. Whether at home or at school, digital technology is almost constant and requires a lot of immobility. Thus, some schools and teachers decide to adopt an outdoor teaching method where a large part of the lessons take place outdoors. This is a way to get back in touch with nature and reduce passive time.
What can we expect from generative AI and web content?
Generative AIs are invading the web, and content is being generated by AIs more and more frequently. They can create text, images, videos and even code. Choose the right tool for the job, and give clear instructions for quality results.
Open for learning: perception as an active, relational process
Ouvrir être acteur de ses sens talks about embodied cognition and the link between body and mind, or how this symbiosis helps us to move beyond the binary world we too often suffer from.
Free yourself from the pressure of social networking
Getting away from the constraints of social networking means identifying emotional triggers to better manage your reactions and reconnect with nature.
