Publish at March 22 2023 Updated March 22 2023
The paradox of learning has always been questioned by researchers in pedagogy. The literature is not lacking in references since Plato and the paradox of Meno on this question... Like all paradoxes, it is not a question of solving it, or even dissolving it, but rather of taking advantage of the energy it gives to those who confront it.
This article is reserved for subscribers to the full edition. You can subscribe Here.
You might also like:
Future of hiring: Will the machine have to be pleased?
More and more, applicants will have to seduce the machine before the recruiter. Indeed, algorithms are able to sort out in a very short time the different candidates applying for a job. They are even able to analyze the answers during interviews. Will we have to learn to please artificial intelligence?
A.I. hallucinations: when it invents realities
AI can generate erroneous information or "hallucinations", with repercussions in critical sectors such as healthcare, justice and education. To mitigate these risks, we need to improve training data, design accurate prompts and encourage AI self-assessment. Education and responsible use are essential to limit these AI drifts.
From the Jungian persona to design personas
A look at Carl Jung's archetypes to understand the limits of the personas proposed by design thinking
Student empowerment and parental responsibility
Learners' failure is often blamed on the school. There may be other reasons for students' lack of guidance and empowerment. In this respect, the imposition of a set path by the parent is often a source of internal conflict and demotivation for the learner. Hence the need to build a framework conducive to student empowerment, through listening and dialogue.
Performing in front of an audience requires emotional competence. How do you develop it?
