Publish at April 28 2026 Updated April 28 2026
Behind the rhetoric of benevolence, some institutions sacrifice their best people to preserve a certain internal comfort. Girard, Freyd and Dejours shed light on this mechanism: the scapegoat is chosen, the slander validated, the competence denied. The real institutional manipulator is not the one who lies, but the one who chooses to believe it.
This article is reserved for subscribers to the full edition. You can subscribe Here.
You might also like:
Would a degree in NFT be reliable?
The blockchain has led to various creations, including one of the most popular in 2021: the NFT or non-fungible token. This certification allows for the sale of unique certified items. Consequently, many believe in the implementation of NFT degrees. But should we trust a polluting technology that shows many limitations in 2022?
Gift and mesology: towards an understanding of human learning communities
Applying gift theory and mesology to learning opens up new perspectives on what we should be paying more attention to when assessing. Teaching is more than just the transmission of knowledge.
Vocational training: quality versus quantity
How can we prepare a generation of workers to drive the continent's economic transformation without exacerbating social inequalities?
Digitization of games: advance or decline?
Gaming has always been an integral part of society. Their digitization has given rise to a new relationship with play. While it's true that this novelty is shaking up the field, in some respects it could accentuate the use of games to transmit knowledge.
From super-facilitator to collective mediator
A review of a Harvard Business Review article on the super facilitator. One hero too many? - How good research is used for bad conclusions.
