Respond to the teacher or argue with him/her in a balanced conversation? To change relationships, let's rearrange the space...
On this video presented by The Technology Showcase you can see how classroom architecture and technologies in conjunction with an active pedagogical approach come to change all relationships between teachers and students and among the students themselves.
The same technologies in a different architecture or without a participatory pedagogy would probably not have achieved great results, at least not of the order observed.
Faculty necessarily change their approach because the structure of the classroom no longer allows for certain modes of communication. Others take advantage of opportunities to initiate activities previously difficult to accomplish or sustain. Finally, the students themselves become involved because otherwise their presence would appear insignificant and uninteresting to themselves as well as to their companions.
Collaboration, interactions, solution finding, discussions, error analysis, mutual aid. The teacher accompanies, stimulates, challenges but does not give the answers. The different participatory formulas seem to have a clearly positive impact, appreciated by both teachers and students. The approach resembles that of Sugatra Mitra, but applied to adults (See article on S.Mitra).
On the article site, you'll also find two audio interviews conducted with ESL teacher Carolyn Samuel and Maureen Baron, who teaches new media in the College of Education, about their experiences teaching in these innovative new spaces.
Captivation is the goal of seduction; hence the idea of contrasting it with attention deficit. If we can be seduced with a blink of an eye, there's a whole context to that blink of an eye for it to become so effective and acquire such a disturbing significance... We teach and learn for a reason, the one that seduces us.
The very principle of environmental education is to integrate oneself into the environment, to take action and not to consider oneself outside the subject.
Education isn't so much "traditional" as systematic, and it's only when it strays from its best practices that it goes wrong. In a context of teacher scarcity, even if reducing group size seems necessary for differentiated pedagogy, it becomes difficult to conceive it in practice; so what direction are institutions taking?
The flow (from source to receiver) that meets the perceived need generates student satisfaction. Teachers, students, pedagogies, technologies, and media can foster or disrupt this flow and generate satisfaction or dissatisfaction.