Respond to the teacher or argue with him/her in a balanced conversation? To change relationships, let's rearrange the space...
On this video presented by The Technology Showcase you can see how classroom architecture and technologies in conjunction with an active pedagogical approach come to change all relationships between teachers and students and among the students themselves.
The same technologies in a different architecture or without a participatory pedagogy would probably not have achieved great results, at least not of the order observed.
Faculty necessarily change their approach because the structure of the classroom no longer allows for certain modes of communication. Others take advantage of opportunities to initiate activities previously difficult to accomplish or sustain. Finally, the students themselves become involved because otherwise their presence would appear insignificant and uninteresting to themselves as well as to their companions.
Collaboration, interactions, solution finding, discussions, error analysis, mutual aid. The teacher accompanies, stimulates, challenges but does not give the answers. The different participatory formulas seem to have a clearly positive impact, appreciated by both teachers and students. The approach resembles that of Sugatra Mitra, but applied to adults (See article on S.Mitra).
On the article site, you'll also find two audio interviews conducted with ESL teacher Carolyn Samuel and Maureen Baron, who teaches new media in the College of Education, about their experiences teaching in these innovative new spaces.
In short, the law of least optimal effort would also be the cure for anxiety, but only if you look beyond yourself and consider longer periods of time. There will undoubtedly be people who will say "Calm down a bit"... and you will answer them "It's much too difficult to do nothing!
The evaluation grid, often perceived as a simple table, nevertheless concentrates technical, symbolic and political stakes. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu, Foucault, Vygotski, Honneth and Sen, this article shows how the co-construction of criteria with learners redefines the pedagogical contract: it exposes power relationships, nurtures intrinsic motivation and paves the way for evaluative justice based on capabilities.
The spirit of classicism, "the moral apprenticeship of freedom and nobility (or beauty)", seems to be just as at home on the Internet as it is with socio-constructivism. Plato and Socrates would be right at home here, if only school were indeed "classical".
The guidance approach aims to make students autonomous, positioning them as players in the process of building their own career path, by equipping them with the skills they need to make the choices they will have to make. In addition to knowledge, know-how and interpersonal skills, the ability to become a key competence in a constantly changing and uncertain world. Orientability is becoming the keystone of 21st century learning.